Civil Society Capacity in Safeguarding Democratic Quality in Mataram
Abstract
This article examines the capacity of civil society to safeguard democratic quality in the city of Mataram. Rather than treating civil society as a moral abstraction, the article approaches it as a practical field of associations, advocacy networks, professional organizations, religious communities, youth groups, media actors, and issue-based coalitions that mediate between citizens and public authority. The main question is how far civil society in Mataram possesses the organizational, communicative, and collaborative capacity required to maintain democratic quality under conditions shaped by local electoral competition, digital information disorder, and institutional fragmentation. The study uses a qualitative document-based method and draws on democratic theory, civil society studies, official local statistics, electoral governance documents, and public reports related to information integrity and participation. The article argues that civil society capacity in Mataram is best understood through five linked dimensions: associative density, civic mediation, participatory institutionalization, information integrity, and advocacy effectiveness. Mataram presents a strategic local setting because it combines the characteristics of an urban administrative center, a relatively dense public sphere, and an increasingly digitalized communication environment. The analysis shows that civil society in Mataram retains meaningful democratic potential, especially in voter education, social oversight, policy communication, and public issue mobilization. At the same time, this capacity remains uneven because many organizations still depend on episodic mobilization, elite mediation, and weak long-term institutionalization. The article concludes that democratic quality in Mataram will depend less on the formal presence of elections alone and more on whether civil society can sustain informed participation, enlarge public accountability, and defend the integrity of local public communication.
Downloads
References
Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat. Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat Dalam Angka 2025. Mataram: BPS Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat, 2025.
Bawaslu Kota Mataram. “Isi Diskusi AJI Mataram, Bawaslu Komat Bedah Indepedensi Media dan Ancaman Hoax Pemilu.” Accessed April 18, 2026.
Bawaslu Kota Mataram. “Refleksi dan Harapan: Bawaslu Kota Mataram Evaluasi Pengawasan Pilkada Partisipatif.” December 7, 2024.
Bawaslu Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat. “Suhardi Ajak Mahasiswa Proaktif Awasi Pilkada NTB 2024.” November 12, 2024.
Berman, Sheri. “Civil Society and the Collapse of the Weimar Republic.” World Politics 49, no. 3 (1997): 401-429.
Chambers, Simone, and Jeffrey Kopstein. “Bad Civil Society.” Political Theory 29, no. 6 (2001): 837-865.
Cohen, Jean L., and Andrew Arato. Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992.
Dahl, Robert A. On Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998.
Creswell, John W. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2013.
DataReportal. Digital 2026: Indonesia. 2025.
Dewan Pers. Pedoman Pemberitaan Media Siber. Jakarta: Dewan Pers, 2012.
Diamond, Larry. Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999.
Dryzek, John S. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Edwards, Michael. Civil Society. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Polity, 2014.
Foley, Michael W., and Bob Edwards. “The Paradox of Civil Society.” Journal of Democracy 7, no. 3 (1996): 38-52.
Freedom House. Freedom in the World 2024: Indonesia. Washington, DC: Freedom House, 2024.
Freedom House. Freedom on the Net 2025: Indonesia. Washington, DC: Freedom House, 2025.
Gramsci, Antonio. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Edited and translated by Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell Smith. New York: International Publishers, 1971.
Habermas, Jürgen. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Translated by Thomas Burger and Frederick Lawrence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1989.
Keane, John. Civil Society: Old Images, New Visions. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1998.
Komisi Pemilihan Umum Kota Mataram. Renstra KPU Kota Mataram 2020-2024. Mataram: KPU Kota Mataram, 2024.
Komisi Pemilihan Umum Kota Mataram. “Rapat Koordinasi dan Launching Indeks Partisipasi Pilkada Tahun 2024.” October 18, 2025.
Levitsky, Steven, and Daniel Ziblatt. How Democracies Die. New York: Crown, 2018.
OECD. Facts Not Fakes: Tackling Disinformation, Strengthening Information Integrity. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2024.
OECD. OECD Survey on Drivers of Trust in Public Institutions 2024 Results. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2024.
Putnam, Robert D. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993.
Tilly, Charles. Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Tocqueville, Alexis de. Democracy in America. Translated by Harvey C. Mansfield and Delba Winthrop. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.
UNESCO. Guidelines for the Governance of Digital Platforms: Safeguarding Freedom of Expression and Access to Information through a Multi-Stakeholder Approach. Paris: UNESCO, 2023.
United Nations Development Programme. Public Sphere for Democratic Governance and Development. New York: UNDP, 2024.
Warren, Mark E. Democracy and Association. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.
World Economic Forum. The Global Risks Report 2025. Geneva: World Economic Forum, 2025.
Young, Iris Marion. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
